Ester v. City of Monmouth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that subsequently enacted, related legislation is not evidence of people’s intent in adopting initiated constitutional provision
• stating that subsequently enacted, related legislation is not evidence of people's intent in adopting initiated constitutional provision
• using that principle to interpret the text of a constitutional initiative
• analyzing “local improvements” and “special benefits” as terms of art with meanings derived from established law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).