Skip to main content
· 1/28/1987

Estepa v. Shad

Citations

  • 652 F. Supp. 567
  • 61 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1715
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 690

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “fact that plaintiff was replaced by another [member of same class] weighs heavily against an inference that [plaintiff] was discriminated against”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Platt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.