Skip to main content

Estep v. State

Citations

  • 193 Tenn. 222
  • 29 Beeler 222
  • 245 S.W.2d 623
  • 1951 Tenn. LEXIS 349

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he right to challenge proposed jurors peremptorily . . . is a privilege only granted to the accused as a matter of grace by the legislature.”
  • “The right to challenge is a right to reject, not to select a jury.”
  • “[B]efore the jury is completed and sworn, the defendant . . . may have learned facts which would justify a challenge for cause, or a peremptory challenge of a juror already accepted, but not sworn. There is no reason why the trial judge should not allow such a challenge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.