Estate of Young v. Holmes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing discoverability of settlement agreements but declining to compel disclosure where party seeking it did not make a particularized showing that material sought was relevant or likely to lead to admissible evidence
• holding that, in light of Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, a party seeking settlement documents must make a “particularized showing that the evidence sought is relevant and calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).