Estate of Whittington v. Emdeko National Housewares, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “there was sufficient evidence that Mrs. Walker swore to the contents of the interrogatory and authorized her attorney to sign. Hence the trial court did not err in allowing the document to be used for impeachment purposes”
• \there was sufficient evidence that Mrs. Walker swore to the contents of the interrogatory and authorized her attorney to sign. Hence the trial court did not err in allowing the document to be used for impeachment purposes\
• no cases forbidding note-taking by a juror of his own volition; counsel cannot request or suggest a jury take notes; “statute [Ill. Rev. Stat. (1979) c. 78, ¶ 36] appears to grant jurors an absolute right to take notes”
• observing the same interrelation between the two rules
• observing the same interrelation between the two rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).