Estate of Ungar v. Orascom Telecom Holding S.A.E.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “assets at issue are, and always have been, held by” the nonparty to the action, and any determination that the judgment debtor and the nonparty were “really one and the same” corporate entity would be an inappropriate exercise of ancillary jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).