Estate of Thompson v. Mercedes-Benz, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that adding cross-complaint to original answer qualifies as amended pleading governed by Rule 15
• determining that trial court erred in denying leave to amend where there had been no showing of injustice by opposing party
• finding that cross-claim amended original answer and treating cross-claim as amended pleading under Alaska Civil Rule 15
• appellant should have been permitted to amend absent any showing that amendment would prejudice opposing party
• noting applicability of AS 09.10.070 to survival claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).