Estate of Sandra Brust and Philip Brust, Etc. v. Acf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring proof, assessed under the test of Sholtis and James, that the plaintiff’s “exposure to the defendant’s asbestos products was a ‘substantial factor’ in causing the disease”
• requiring proof, assessed under the test of Sholtis and James, that the plaintiff’s “exposure to the defendant’s asbestos products was a ‘substantial factor’ in causing the disease”
• “[I]t is undisputed that mesothelioma can develop from minimal exposure to asbestos.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).