Skip to main content
· 4/25/1994

Estate of Otto v. Estate Fair

Citations

  • 316 Ark. 674
  • 875 S.W.2d 487
  • 1994 Ark. LEXIS 252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “Georgia’s new Evidence Code, which applies to cases tried after January 1, 2013, allows a court to consider ‘plain errors affecting substantial rights although such errors were not brought to the attention of the court’”
  • noting that “Georgia’s new Evidence Code, which applies to cases tried after January 1,2013, allows a court to consider ‘plain errors affecting substantial rights although such errors were not brought to the attention of the court’ ”
  • noting availability of plain error review after the adoption of Georgia’s new Evidence Code
  • “Georgia’s new Evidence Code, which applies to cases tried after January 1, 2013, allows a court to consider ‘plain errors affecting substantial rights although such errors were not brought to the attention of the court.’ OCGA § 24-1-103 (d).”
  • “Georgia’s new Evidence Code, which applies to cases tried after January 1, 2013, allows a court to consider ‘plain errors affecting substantial rights although such errors were not brought to the attention of the court.’ OCGA § 24-1-103 (d).”
  • “Georgia’s new Evidence Code, which applies to cases tried after January 1, 2013, allows a court to consider ‘plain errors affecting substantial rights although such errors were not brought to the attention of the court.’ OCGA § 24-1-103 (d).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dudley, Hays, Holt, Newbern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.