Estate of Nachimson v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that absent certain exceptions, “failure to exhaust [an IDEA claim] will deprive a federal court of subject matter jurisdiction”
• holding that absent certain exceptions, “failure to exhaust [an IDEA claim] will deprive a federal court of subject matter jurisdiction”
• describing systemic exception for “procedural violations that effectively deprive plaintiffs of an administrative forum” (citation modified)
• “[T]he systemic exception to exhaustion is largely limited to those procedural violations that effectively deprive plaintiffs of an administrative forum.”
• grant of summary judgment eliminated the “need [to] address the class certification issues,” because “Rule 23 is a procedural device that cannot be interpreted to abridge, enlarge or modify any substantive right”
• systemic exception did not apply where parent plaintiffs “dispute[d] the adequacy of the quantity, quality, and consistency” of interpretation/translation services but did not allege that “access to the administrative hearing process” had been compromised by such failures

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).