· 10/28/1970
Estate of Murdoch ex rel. Frankel v. Pennsylvania
Citations
- 432 F.2d 867
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- mentioning no jurisdictional issue in a lawsuit between German and Panamanian interests as to vessels shipwrecked in the English channel
- mentioning no jurisdictional issue in a lawsuit between German and Panamanian interests as to vessels shipwrecked in the English channel
- mentioning no jurisdictional issue in a lawsuit between German and Panamanian interests as to vessels shipwrecked in the English channel
- inability to implead other parties directly involved is part of the “clear prejudice which defendants would suffer if jurisdiction were retained”
- inability to implead other parties directly involved is part of the \clear prejudice which defendants would suffer if jurisdiction were retained\
- district court did not abuse its discretion “in failing to require detailed disclosure by the defendants of the names of their proposed witnesses and the substance of their testimony”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Freedman, Hastie, Maris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.