Estate of Maudsley v. Meta Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendants owed a duty of reasonable care based on state statutes that impose obligations on entities that are licensed to screen, evaluate, and treat the mentally ill
• stating that mental health statutes give rise to a duty by mental health facilities to screen, evaluate, and treat individuals who may be in need of mental health services
• holding superior 10 GROWTH v. TENBAR, et al. Decision of the Court court should not have granted summary judgment when factfinder needed to decide preliminary fact question based on conflicting evidence
• stating “determinations of duty should not be based on a ‘fact-specific analysis’ of the relationship between the parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).