· 11/25/2009
ESTATE OF MADRIGAL v. Madrigal
Citations
- 22 So. 3d 828
- 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17718
- 2009 WL 4061747
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that affirmance was warranted where the trial court’s findings of fact were supported by competent substantial evidence and the findings of fact support the trial court’s determination of undue influence
- noting that affirmance was warranted where the trial court’s findings of fact were supported by competent, substantial evidence and the findings of fact support the trial court’s determination of undue influence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ramirez, Rothenberg, Schwartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.