Skip to main content
· 11/25/2009

ESTATE OF MADRIGAL v. Madrigal

Citations

  • 22 So. 3d 828
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17718
  • 2009 WL 4061747

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that affirmance was warranted where the trial court’s findings of fact were supported by competent substantial evidence and the findings of fact support the trial court’s determination of undue influence
  • noting that affirmance was warranted where the trial court’s findings of fact were supported by competent, substantial evidence and the findings of fact support the trial court’s determination of undue influence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ramirez, Rothenberg, Schwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.