Estate of Koester v. Hale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the issuance of a new certificate of title that excludes land erroneously included in a prior certificate does not offend the Torrens system
• ruling that issuance of a new certificate excluding land erroneously included in a prior certificate “does not offend the prohibition against opening ‘the original decree of registration’ ”
• concluding plain meaning of torrens provisions is that they are intended to prevent unjust enrichment that otherwise would necessarily result if purchaser of registered land obtained more land than was owned, claimed, or .possessed by predecessor in title who registered land
• concluding plain meaning of torrens provisions is that they are intended to prevent unjust enrichment that otherwise would necessarily result if purchaser of registered land obtained more land than was owned, claimed, or possessed by predecessor in title who registered land

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).