Estate of Johnson v. Adkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, even though incorrect legal theory supported trial court judgment, where “the finding of fact is consistent with the judgment[,] it will be affirmed.”
• concluding that the claim of quantum meruit, not unjust enrichment, applied to the facts
• discussing the doctrine of unjust enrichment as a measure of damages as opposed to an independent theory of recovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).