Estate of Jackson v. Miss. Life Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, where the purposes of Rule 4.03 were still satisfied, the party’s failure to strictly comply with the rule did not constitute a procedural waiver of the contested facts
• its purpose is for the trial court “that is swamped with an overwhelming number of civil and criminal dispositive motions” (internal quotation mark omitted) (quoting Dominguez v. Eli Lilly & Co., 958 F.Supp. 721, 727 (D.P.R. 1997))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).