Skip to main content
· 8/19/2004

Estate of Hollywood v. First National Bank of Palmerton

Citations

  • 859 A.2d 472
  • 2004 Pa. Super. 321
  • 54 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 343
  • 2004 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “commercial and social interests of negotiability, finality, and uniformity” militate in favor of rejecting the discovery rule in case involving claim under the Code
  • holding that Pennsylvania law “does not provide grounds for recovery on the basis of inter vivos transfers alleged to diminish an eventual bequest”
  • finding the limitation period to run for unauthorized payment claims when the instrument is negotiated, and making an analogy to claims for conversion of negotiable instruments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Todd, Panella, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.