· 8/19/2004
Estate of Hollywood v. First National Bank of Palmerton
Citations
- 859 A.2d 472
- 2004 Pa. Super. 321
- 54 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 343
- 2004 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2771
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the “commercial and social interests of negotiability, finality, and uniformity” militate in favor of rejecting the discovery rule in case involving claim under the Code
- holding that Pennsylvania law “does not provide grounds for recovery on the basis of inter vivos transfers alleged to diminish an eventual bequest”
- finding the limitation period to run for unauthorized payment claims when the instrument is negotiated, and making an analogy to claims for conversion of negotiable instruments
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Todd, Panella, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.