Estate of Hanley v. Andresen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a named beneficiary was entitled to FEGLIA proceeds despite an absolute waiver in a divorce decree because the decree “conflict[ed] with the statutorily required procedure to change the designation of beneficiary”
• holding that the divorce decree could not operate to change the designated beneficiary
• where divorce decree purported to divest named beneficiary of rights under FEGLI, failure to properly execute change in designation entitled named beneficiary to proceeds as against competing claimants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).