Skip to main content
· 12/3/2010

Estate of Hamilton v. City of New York

Citations

  • 627 F.3d 50
  • 84 Fed. R. Serv. 212
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 24666
  • 110 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1537
  • 2010 WL 4909676

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling only that the New York Police Department was “clearly” a governmental agency
  • affirming district court’s refusal to consider hearsay offered in opposition to motion for summary judgment
  • “It is well settled in this circuit that a party’s affidavit which contradicts his own prior deposition testimony should be disregarded on a motion for summary judgment.”
  • district court “correctly excluded” evidence of subsequent remedial measures on summary judgment because such evidence “plainly runs afoul of Rule 407 of the Federal Rules of Evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Walker, Cabranes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.