Skip to main content
· 10/1/1979

Estate of Grossman

Citations

  • 406 A.2d 726
  • 486 Pa. 460
  • 1979 Pa. LEXIS 681

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reciting that stare decisis “permits the orderly growth processes of the law to flourish” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • reciting that stare decisis “permits the orderly growth processes of the law to flourish” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • stating that “[w]e can conceive of no acceptable rationale for a per se rule disqualifying the testimony of the spouse of a surviving interested party to a transaction with a decedent.”
  • abandoning per se rule disqualifying testimony of the spouse of a surviving interested party to a transaction with a decedent
  • abandoning per se rule disqualifying testimony of the spouse of a surviving interested party to a transaction with a decedent
  • abandoning per se rule disqualifying testimony of the spouse of a surviving interested party to a transaction with a decedent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Nix, Manderino, Larsen, Pomeroy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.