Estate of Grimm v. Evans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[t]he court was required to determine whether the arbitration provision was unconscionable”
• holding a mental capacity defense must be resolved by the court because it denies that an agreement to arbitrate exists and without an agreement to arbitrate the arbitrator cannot act
• noting that an arbitration provision may be found unconscionable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).