Estate of Friedman v. Pierce County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a litigant's taking claim was not ripe because of a failure to exhaust administrative remedies
• holding that a litigant's taking claim was not ripe because of a failure to exhaust administrative remedies
• holding that issue of futility of administrative remedies is question for court and not jury
• noting that a number of courts have held certain matters are for court to decide, even though court was required to make factual determinations
• “We have implicitly recognized that exhaustion and ripeness are related concepts in the land use 7 No. 80377-8-I/8 area.”
• whether administrative remedies are futile is a question for the court and can be demonstrated by factual circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).