Skip to main content
· 9/19/2011

Estate of Ellington Ex Rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imports Ltd.

Citations

  • 812 F. Supp. 2d 186
  • 2011 WL 4373937

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing counterclaims with prejudice under Rule 41(b) where corporate defendants stopped prosecuting them and failed to retain counsel
  • dismissing for failure to prosecute where it was “apparent” that the claimant had “stopped prosecuting” their claims
  • finding, where no objections have been made, “the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matsumoto, Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.