Skip to main content
· 9/27/2011

Estate of Eiteljorg Ex Rel. Eiteljorg v. Eiteljorg

Citations

  • 813 F. Supp. 2d 1069
  • 2011 WL 4479045
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that when a contract's language is ambiguous, a court \cannot properly determine [its meaning] on a motion to dismiss\
  • stating that the court may look beyond the jurisdictional allegations of the complaint and view whatever evidence has been submitted when deciding a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1)
  • “[T]he Seventh Circuit recognizes that being bound by or interested in result of pending litigation does not make a party one that is ‘required’ to be joined under Rule 19(a)(1).”
  • “If the language of an alleged contract is ambiguous regarding the parties’ intent, the interpretation of the language is a question of fact which a [court] cannot properly determine on a motion to dismiss”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sarah Evans Barker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.