Estate of Deaves
Citations
- 140 Pa. 242
- 21 A. 395
- 1891 Pa. LEXIS 835
Syllabus
<p>1. When it is shown that a will was in existence, urn-evoked, at the time of the testator’s death, and was afterwards lost or destroyed, its contents may be proved by parol and the will thus reproduced admitted to probate : Foster’s App., 87 Pa. 67 ; but the proof of the contents should be very clear, especially when the will is set up, in part at least, by the testimony of interested witnesses: Per Mr. Chief Justice Paxson.</p> <p>2. When, however, there is no proof that a will actually executed was in existence, unrevoked, at the testator’s death, but, on the contrary, it was admittedly lost in his lifetime, and yet, with knowledge thereof for months before his death, the testator declined or neglected to reproduce and republish its contents, its revocation may fairly be presumed and probate of it refused.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Resolutions of credibility are within the province of the . . . fact finder and such resolution does not constitute capricious disregard of competent evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Green, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.