Estate of Collings v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the moving party must demonstrate that the newly discovered evidence was not in its possession, nor could it reasonably have been discovered at the time of the interlocutory decision
• explaining that a litigant cannot decline to address an issue, either through inadvertence or as a strategic maneuver, and then expect the court to grant reconsideration to advance arguments that it previously could and should have made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).