Estate of Coll-Monge v. Inner Peace Movement

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the required control over the use of the mark as to the nature and quality of goods or serves “may include not only corporate control but also licensing agreements and other types of oversight”
• holding that documents showing that plaintiff exercised control over claimed related company’s use of mark “put into dispute whether or not Coll controlled the use of the Non-Profits’ marks from the marks’ first use and therefore preclude summary judgment on the ownership issue”
• “The Chamber failed to properly evaluate the facts and evidence . . .”
• four-part test for such relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).