Skip to main content
· 8/29/2018

Estate of Christophe Girerd v. Sana Energy & Management Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that nearly identical language in an indictment was sufficient under Rule 32.2
  • explaining that “a court should not consider sentences imposed on defendants in other cases in the absence of such a showing [of similarity] by a party”
  • “[S]tatements that are offered merely to show that they happened are not offered for a hearsay purpose.”
  • “Any speculation about what might have happened had he been charged in some other jurisdiction . . . does not in the Court’s view create a sentencing disparity let alone an unwarranted sentencing disparity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.