· 11/2/2006
Estate of Butler Ex Rel. Butler v. Maharishi University of Management
Citations
- 460 F. Supp. 2d 1030
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80486
- 2006 WL 3117841
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that, “[u]under Rule 17, . . . ratification avoids a statute of limitations bar, because the action is treated as if brought in the name of the real party in interest . . . at the commencement of the action”
- allowing substitution where the decedent’s brother was named administrator after the filing of the lawsuit
- finding that, “[u]under Rule 17, . . . ratification avoids a statute of limitations bar, because the action is treated as if brought in the name of the real party in interest . . . at the commencement of the action on February 27, 2006”
- finding Rule 17 avoided the statute of limitations in a similar manner in a case where the real party in interest had not even yet been appointed administrator at the time of filing the original complaint
- “Rule 17 provides a method for preventing the forfeiture of legitimate actions that are mistakenly brought by a party other than the real party in interest.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gritzner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.