Skip to main content
· 11/2/2006

Estate of Butler Ex Rel. Butler v. Maharishi University of Management

Citations

  • 460 F. Supp. 2d 1030
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80486
  • 2006 WL 3117841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that, “[u]under Rule 17, . . . ratification avoids a statute of limitations bar, because the action is treated as if brought in the name of the real party in interest . . . at the commencement of the action”
  • allowing substitution where the decedent’s brother was named administrator after the filing of the lawsuit
  • finding that, “[u]under Rule 17, . . . ratification avoids a statute of limitations bar, because the action is treated as if brought in the name of the real party in interest . . . at the commencement of the action on February 27, 2006”
  • finding Rule 17 avoided the statute of limitations in a similar manner in a case where the real party in interest had not even yet been appointed administrator at the time of filing the original complaint
  • “Rule 17 provides a method for preventing the forfeiture of legitimate actions that are mistakenly brought by a party other than the real party in interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gritzner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.