Estate of Bunn v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding a plaintiff requesting an injunction requiring her former employer to adopt and 7 enforce lawful policies “lacked standing to sue for injunctive relief from which she would not likely benefit”
• finding petitioner’s pro se status and reliance on inmate helpers 7 not to be extraordinary circumstances justifying equitable tolling
• a claim accrues when a plaintiff knows of both the injury and 7 its cause and not when the plaintiff “suspects a legal wrong”
• “The First Amendment protects the right to photograph and 7 record matters of public interest.”
• “28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) allows the district court to waive 7 the fee, for most individuals unable to afford it, by granting IFP status.”
• intra-corporate disclosures and disclosures to third parties 7 providing services in support of business operations fell within the “order fulfillment” or “request 8 processing” exemptions of §§ 2710(a)(2) and (b)(2)(E)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).