Skip to main content
· 11/16/2004

Esso Standard Oil v. Mujica Cotto

Citations

  • 389 F.3d 212
  • 34 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20139
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 23894
  • 2004 WL 2591043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • bias concerns implicated where an “adjudicative body stands to benefit financially from the proceeding because any fine imposed [would] flow directly to [its] budget”
  • “a pecuniary interest need not be personal to compromise an adjudicator’s neutrality’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Lipez, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.