· 11/16/2004
Esso Standard Oil v. Mujica Cotto
Citations
- 389 F.3d 212
- 34 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20139
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 23894
- 2004 WL 2591043
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- bias concerns implicated where an “adjudicative body stands to benefit financially from the proceeding because any fine imposed [would] flow directly to [its] budget”
- “a pecuniary interest need not be personal to compromise an adjudicator’s neutrality’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Lipez, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.