Skip to main content
· 2/1/1938

Esslinger v. State

Citations

  • 28 Ala. App. 623
  • 178 So. 923

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[rjegardless of the defendant’s argument in the district court case, the defendant cannot be estopped from asserting lack of subject matter jurisdiction as a defense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Samford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.