Skip to main content
· 12/24/1992

Essie Cosmetics, Ltd. v. Dae Do International, Ltd.

Citations

  • 808 F. Supp. 952
  • 1992 WL 379983

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that class of consumers is narrower where private label producer does not compete with its own products in retail market
  • explaining that a court may grant injunctive relief before actual use in commerce where such use is “imminent and impending”
  • “Even different labels on nearly identical bottles may cause confusion.”
  • “Even different labels on nearly identical bottles may cause confusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weinstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.