Esser v. Ciarmella

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “most, if not all, temporary impairments” are not disabilities under the KCRA
• applying the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework to analyze a KCRA claim
• “[N]o matter these current definitions, ‘the KCRA retains the [ADA’s] former definition of disability[,]’ prior to the 2008 Amendments of the federal law.”
• “[T]he KCRA retains the [ADA’s] former definition of disability, prior to the 2008 Amendments of the federal law.” (citation modified)
• applying McDonnell Douglas to a disability discrimination claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).