Essay v. Essay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[An expelled partner who] does not acquiesce in the termination of the partnership but demands a winding up of the partnership ... is entitled to share in the profits until the partnership business has been finally terminated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gast v. Peters
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2003-11-21· cited 38×
• Essay v. Essay
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1966-04-01· cited 28×
• Smith v. Daub
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1985-04-12· cited 19×
• First National Bank of Kenosha v. Schaefer
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1979-07-20· cited 17×
• Loan Modification Group, Inc. v. Reed
  First Circuit· 2012-09-21· cited 15×
• Essay v. Essay
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1963-10-11· cited 11×
• Bass v. Dalton
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1984-09-21· cited 8×
• Essay v. Essay
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1966-05-06· cited 6×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bode v. Prettyman
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1948-01-16· cited 37×
• Baum v. McBride
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1950-01-06· cited 19×
• Riley v. Riley
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1948-08-10· cited 19×
• Frey v. Hauke
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1961-03-17· cited 10×