Esquibel v. Hallmark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that in reviewing a trial court’s findings of fact for substantial evidence, the appellate courts “entertain all reasonable presumptions in favor of the correctness of the trial court’s findings”
• stating that in reviewing a trial court’s findings of fact for substantial evidence, the appellate courts “entertain all reasonable presumptions in favor of the correctness of the trial court’s findings”
• decree quieting title in claimant must be supported by strength of claimant's own title, and function of decree is not to confer title but merely to confirm claimant's pre-existing title

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lopez v. Adams
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-12-02· cited 35×
• Pacheco v. Martinez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1981-10-20· cited 30×
• State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. Minjares
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-06-16· cited 21×
• State v. Pedroncelli
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1981-12-01· cited 16×
• Blumenthal v. Concrete Constructors Co.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1984-11-20· cited 16×
• Quarles v. Arcega
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-09-02· cited 8×
• Pueblo of Santa Ana v. Alfredo Baca and Mary Lou Baca
  Tenth Circuit· 1988-03-25· cited 6×
• State ex rel. Martinez v. Parker Townsend Ranch Co.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-12-18· cited 5×
• State ex rel. Office of the State Engineer v. Elephant Butte Irrigation District
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-08-06· cited 4×
• Stone v. Turner
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-07-06· cited 3×
• Toney v. Coe
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-01-16· cited 1×
• State ex rel. Office of State Eng'r v. Elephant Butte Irrigation Dist.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-04-26
• Matter of Will of Coe
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-01-16