Skip to main content
· 10/4/2006

Esque Real Estate Hold. v. Ch Consulting

Citations

  • 940 So. 2d 1185
  • 2006 WL 2818801

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “because [the bank] ... failed to allege any irregularity or defect connected with the sale process, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying their motion to vacate the foreclosure sale without holding an evidentiary hearing”
  • noting Ingorvaia in dicta and distinguishing it as a case involving a “defect or irregularity connected with the sale” where “due process concerns made the sale irregular”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.