Espinoza v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing evidence of specific violent acts of the victim previously known by the defendant in order to show the reasonableness of the defendant’s claim of apprehension of danger

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Miller
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-09-22· cited 142×
• Buhl v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1998-01-21· cited 38×
• Timothy Uddley v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2008-12-22
• Daniel Hernandez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1996-02-28
• Miller, Ex Parte Carl Eddie
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-10-28
• Kendrick Tormai Hines v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-02-10

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brimage v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-01-10· cited 376×
• Dempsey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1954-04-07· cited 98×
• Thompson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-09-14· cited 72×
• Gutierrez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-02-01· cited 65×
• Beecham v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-05-09· cited 52×
• Stone v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1988-05-05· cited 49×
• Fry v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1996-01-18· cited 45×
• Lowe v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-03-11· cited 24×
• Dixon v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-06-16· cited 19×