· 3/19/2010
Espinoza v. Rudolph
Citations
- 46 So. 3d 403
- 2010 Ala. LEXIS 48
- 2010 WL 996531
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to reverse a judgment based on an argument that had been raised for the first time in a postjudgment motion because there was no indication that the trial court had considered that argument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cobb, Lyons, Woodall, Stuart, Smith, Bolin, Parker, Murdock, Shaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.