Skip to main content
· 10/6/2008

Espinosa v. Binnings Pan American

Citations

  • 995 So. 2d 571
  • 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 15468

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Co-defendants are not without variance, and need not, in terms of punishment, be treated similarly because they are rarely, if ever, exactly similar.”
  • “[t]he defendant has not carried his burden of persuasion that . . . his sentence was the result of penalizing him for having exercised his right to a jury trial”
  • claim that court improperly admitted specific crimes of which defendant found guilty
  • claim that court improperly admitted specific crimes of which defendant found guilty
  • limited to wilful failure to appear statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benton, Hawkes, Nortwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.