· 6/5/2017
Espino-Paez v. People
Citations
- 2017 CO 61
- 395 P.3d 786
- 2017 WL 2427146
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- appellate court not obligated to engage in analysis that is not necessary to adjudicate the case and controversy before it
- appellate court is not obligated to engage in analysis not necessary to adjudicate case and controversy before it
- “[A] warrant for the search of the contents of a cell phone must be sufficiently limited in scope to allow a search of only that content that is related to the probable cause that justifies the search.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.