Skip to main content
· 6/5/2017

Espino-Paez v. People

Citations

  • 2017 CO 61
  • 395 P.3d 786
  • 2017 WL 2427146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • appellate court not obligated to engage in analysis that is not necessary to adjudicate the case and controversy before it
  • appellate court is not obligated to engage in analysis not necessary to adjudicate case and controversy before it
  • “[A] warrant for the search of the contents of a cell phone must be sufficiently limited in scope to allow a search of only that content that is related to the probable cause that justifies the search.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.