Espin v. Gantner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the passage of time, alone cannot support such an [APA] claim of unreasonable delay
• concluding that plaintiff failed to state a claim for unreasonable delay where adjustment application had been pending for three years
• concluding that plaintiff failed to state a claim for unreasonable delay where adjustment application had been pending for three years
• dismissing claim of unreasonable delay by petitioner whose green card application had been pending for three years
• “The process of immigration status adjustment is not susceptible to mandamus jurisdiction because it is wholly discretionary with the Attorney General.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).