Skip to main content
· 7/19/1999

Espat v. Espat

Citations

  • 56 F. Supp. 2d 1377
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10891
  • 1999 WL 521794

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that obtaining new counsel and conducting further investigation into the facts were reasonable justifications for adding a non-diverse party after removal
  • all applying the Hensgens factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kovachevich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.