Esopus Creek Value LP v. Hauf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where party claimed that conflicting SEC rules prevented a stockholder vote, finding that “[g]iven the mutually reinforcing purposes of these state and federal laws, there is reason to suppose that the SEC will duly consider a request for exemptive relief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).