Skip to main content
· 10/5/1994

Eslinger v. U.S. Central Credit Union

Citations

  • 866 F. Supp. 491
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15948
  • 1994 WL 608605

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • comments by manager that women are better workers before having their second child were sufficient to create inference of sex discrimination and survive summary judgment when same manager fired plaintiff after she gave birth to second child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lungstrum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.