Skip to main content
· 1/13/1951

Eslick v. Friedman

Citations

  • 235 S.W.2d 808
  • 191 Tenn. 647
  • 27 Beeler 647
  • 1951 Tenn. LEXIS 369

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • beneficiary of will which had been set aside was required to file claim against estate of decedent for value of services rendered prior to his death, this being the “exclusive remedy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.