Eskelsen v. Town of Perry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to adopt “[r]igid standards regarding proof” of pre-1903 beneficial water use
• \An appropriative water right depends on beneficial use for its continued validity.\
• \[T]he state is ... vitally interested in seeing that none of the waters are allowed to run to waste or go without being applied to a beneficial use for any great number of years.\ (quotation and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).