Skip to main content
· 12/22/1999

Eshoo v. Chicago Transit Authority

Citations

  • 723 N.E.2d 339
  • 309 Ill. App. 3d 831
  • 243 Ill. Dec. 307
  • 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where, as here, a plaintiff’s status at the time of his injury is disputed or different inferences may be drawn from undisputed facts, the plaintiff's status as invitee or trespasser is a question of fact for the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cahill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.