Eshoo v. Chicago Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where, as here, a plaintiff’s status at the time of his injury is disputed or different inferences may be drawn from undisputed facts, the plaintiff's status as invitee or trespasser is a question of fact for the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mikolajczyk v. Ford Motor Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2008-12-18· cited 149×
• Salazar v. Crown Enterprises, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-03-12· cited 9×
• Cole v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2025-03-14· cited 1×
• Mikolajczykv. Ford Motor Company
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2008-10-17
• Debra Jo Robeson v. Vieth Construction Corporation
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2016-04-06

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Leonardi v. Loyola University of Chicago
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1995-10-26· cited 445×
• Lee v. Chicago Transit Authority
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1992-10-22· cited 416×
• Advincula v. United Blood Services
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1996-12-19· cited 324×
• Rhodes v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1996-03-28· cited 207×
• Duffy v. Cortesi
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1954-03-17· cited 89×
• Howat v. Donelson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-05-18· cited 17×
• GREEN BY FRITZ v. Jackson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-06-30· cited 15×
• Cockrell v. Koppers Industries, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-06-21· cited 7×