· 12/22/1999
Eshoo v. Chicago Transit Authority
Citations
- 723 N.E.2d 339
- 309 Ill. App. 3d 831
- 243 Ill. Dec. 307
- 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 895
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where, as here, a plaintiff’s status at the time of his injury is disputed or different inferences may be drawn from undisputed facts, the plaintiff's status as invitee or trespasser is a question of fact for the jury.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cahill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.