· 5/30/1895
Eshleman v. Lightner
Citations
- 169 Pa. 46
- 32 A. 63
- 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1066
Syllabus
<p>Sate — Warranty.</p> <p>Where the sole defense to an action for money due for the purchase of a horse was a warranty of the horse and a breach thereof, evidence that, upon discovering the breach, defendant rescinded the sale and returned the horse to plaintiff, was not admissible.</p>
Judges: Dean, Fell, Mitchell, Sterrett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.