Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2/24/1977
Eshelman v. Blubaum
Citations
- 560 P.2d 1283
- 114 Ariz. 376
- 1977 Ariz. App. LEXIS 511
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court can strike down administrative agency’s interpretation of its own rule when it defeats a statute’s purpose
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eubank, Schroeder, Wren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Aguilera v. BacaNinth Circuit· 2007-12-27· cited 91×
- Kaske v. City of RockfordIllinois Supreme Court· 1983-01-24· cited 50×
- City of Warrensville Heights v. JenningsOhio Supreme Court· 1991-04-03· cited 43×
- Gandy v. State Ex Rel. Division of Investigation & NarcoticsNevada Supreme Court· 1980-03-13· cited 41×
- Forino v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-08-26· cited 27×
- Murphy v. Town of Chino ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-10-31· cited 24×
- Farmer v. City of Fort LauderdaleSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-02-10· cited 24×
- Buege v. LeeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-01-19· cited 23×
- Ethridge v. Arizona State Board of NursingCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-12-21· cited 20×
- Sanders v. NovickCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-11-10· cited 19×
- Gardiner v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-11-25· cited 18×
- Smith v. Arizona Long Term Care SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-01-22· cited 15×
- Oberg v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court· 1983-12-22· cited 13×
- Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Magma Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-02-13· cited 13×
- Carley v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-02-26· cited 13×
- Rivera v. City of DouglasCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-02-18· cited 12×
- Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Magma Copper Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-04-01· cited 12×
- Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. State Land DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-11-18· cited 10×
- State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-12-09· cited 10×
- McMurren v. JMC Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-02-25· cited 10×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1967-01-23· cited 1,543×
- Uniformed Sanitation Men Ass'n v. Commissioner of Sanitation of New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 436×
- DeVito v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1961-06-26· cited 78×
- Coursey v. Board Fire & Police Com'rs of SkokieAppellate Court of Illinois· 1967-11-30· cited 67×
- Red Rover Copper Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1941-11-10· cited 60×
- Seattle Police Officers' Guild v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1972-03-02· cited 44×
- Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co. v. SakrisonArizona Supreme Court· 1950-12-29· cited 44×
- Molino v. Board of Public SafetySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1966-12-21· cited 37×
- Fichera v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-06-27· cited 33×
- Roux v. New Orleans Police DepartmentLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1969-06-02· cited 30×
- Frazee v. Civil Service BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1959-05-13· cited 29×
- McCain v. SheridanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1958-05-07· cited 28×
- Schade v. Arizona State Retirement SystemArizona Supreme Court· 1973-05-23· cited 19×
- Arizona Bd. of Regents v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY.Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-12-09· cited 16×
- Richardson v. City of PasadenaCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1973-09-26· cited 16×
- Arizona Department of Economic Security v. LidbackCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-03-16· cited 13×
- Dolan v. KellyNew York Supreme Court· 1973-09-21· cited 13×
- Dieck v. Department of PoliceLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1972-06-06· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.